Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Obama's Speech - Blog #2

Obama's speech "The Connection Between Faith and Politics" seems to be a speech that is strongly based on Ethos and Pathos. In this case I consider the higher power, or Ethos, to be religion, specifically Christianity. He uses the teachings of the Bible and God, which are higher powers, to emotionally manipulate his audience. He uses these strategies not to help strengthen his speech but to get trust from his audience, to make himself look more credible and to deter the audience from assuming that he might not know what he's talking about. He says, "It was because of these newfound understandings that I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ on 95th Street in the Southside of Chicago one day and affirm my Christian faith. It came about as a choice, and not an epiphany. I didn't fall out in church. The questions I had didn't magically disappear. But kneeling beneath that cross on the South Side, I felt that I heard God's spirit beckoning me. I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth." He uses this strategy at the beginning of his speech to gain his audience's approval and to catch their attention. Because who wants to listen to someone they don't trust? 

In the latter part of his speech he addresses the infusion of religion into government. He mostly uses logos to argue his main points. His main points being that religion has no place in politics because not everyone shares  the same values and worldviews. So, a government based on religion would tear the country apart. Obama says, "Now this is going to be difficult for some who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, as many evangelicals do. But in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics depends on our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what's possible. At some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It's the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God's edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one's life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing."

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Obama's Speech on Religion - Blog Entry #1

On Wednesday, June 28th, 2006, Barack Obama gave a speech regarding religion and politics. He gave this speech because He believes that he has a solution to our problem of religion and politics interfering with each other, causing conflict. 
Obama begins his speech trying to capture the audience's attention by bringing up a highly debated topic: religion. At the beginning of the speech he tries to appeal to people's emotions by making them feel bad for him. He decided to talk about when another politician said, "Jesus Christ would not vote for Barack Obama." I believe the reason he brought this up was simply to make people feel bad for him, thus more willing to listen to him and accept what he' saying by looking past the facts and figures and simply relying on their feelings. 
In his speech he talks a lot about how the biggest gaps in our society are between the religious and non-religious. He said they argue over moral issues like gays marriage, abortion and other socio-ethical issues. He goes on and on about how religion has caused and is causing a majority of problems and conflicts in today’s society.
Throughout the speech Obama also mentions that religion can be a good thing to base your life on and certain religious teachings can be good for society and government. He mentioned in part of his speech that they could increase tax dollars to help poor children receive an education because the Bible teaches us that we should help people who are not as privileged as us, especially when they’re children.
Obama ends the speech in what seems like an attempt to make himself look better. He brings up something that He did wrong, blames his staff for it, then proceeds to appeal to people’s emotions by saying his prayer which was, “A hope that we can live with one another in a way that reconciles the beliefs of each with the good of all.” Which is obviously something that almost everyone wants, so mentioning that he prayed it must have been a strategy to get his audience on his side.